4.3 Article

Operational and contextual barriers to accessing supervised consumption services in two Canadian cities

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102991

关键词

Supervised consumption services; Supervised consumption sites; Barriers to access; Policing; Qualitative research

资金

  1. SSHRC Explore Grant [23522]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that while most PWUD have positive perceptions of SCS, they face operational and contextual barriers when accessing SCS. These barriers are consistent between SCS users and non-SCS users, though some SCS users actively work to counter contextual barriers among peers.
Background and Aims: While previous scholarship has documented barriers to Supervised Consumption Services (SCS) access, little is known about how Non-SCS-users perceive available, sanctioned SCS, and how such perceptions may hinder their SCS use. The objectives of this study were to examine: 1) barriers to accessing SCS for SCS-users and Non-SCS-users; and 2) the extent to which these barriers are consistent between groups. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 75 PWUD in two cities in Western Canada, Edmonton and Calgary, who may or may not have accessed available SCS. Participants were recruited on the streets near SCS via traditional fieldwork and snowball sampling. We employed a generalized prompt guide and asked a range of questions about how PWUD perceived and/or experienced SCS in the area. All interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed, thematically coded, and analysed. Results: Despite PWUD?s generally positive perceptions of SCS, we identified several operational barriers to SCS access, including wait times and time limits, restrictions on injection assistance, and client bans from clinics. We also identified contextual barriers, including perceptions of the ?unnecessary? use of naloxone and police surveillance. Importantly, these barriers were consistent between SCS-users and Non-SCS-users, though some SCS-users actively worked to counter contextual barriers among peers. Conclusion: Operational and contextual barriers to SCS use contribute to intermittent access for existing clients and preclude SCS access for others. Addressing such barriers may increase SCS uptake, thereby further extending the well-documented and critical reach of these harm reduction initiatives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据