4.7 Article

Study of combined effects of glycerol and transglutaminase on properties of gelatin films

期刊

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 1-9

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.10.004

关键词

Glycerol content; Cross-linking; Mechanical properties

资金

  1. National 125 Program [2011BAD23B02, 2013AA102207]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31171686, 31401532, 31571891]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2012556]
  4. 111 Project [B07029, PCSIRT0627, JUSRP11422, JUSRP51507]
  5. Collaborative innovation center of food safety and quality control in Jiangsu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gelatin films plasticized with different glycerol contents (0-40%) were cross-linked using transglutaminase (TGase). Unmodified films were prepared as controls. Cross-linking degree of the films decreased linearly with increasing glycerol content, resulting in an increase in water solubility. Glycerol increased the mobility and free volume of the gelatin film matrix as observed by differential scanning calorimetry, thus increasing the moisture content and thickness. Tensile strength and Young's modulus had a negative linear correlation with glycerol content, with no significant differences between TGase-modified and unmodified films (p > 0.05). However, TGase-modified films showed a 294% and 187% relative increase in elongation at break and toughness, respectively, in comparison with controls at 30% glycerol content (p < 0.05). X-ray diffraction and circular dichroism spectroscopy both showed a linear decrease in triple-helix content as glycerol content increased, and TGase-modified films had lower triple helix contents. Also, the second derivative of FTIR spectra showed that TGase-modified films had increased single alpha-helix structures, but decreased disordered coil structures. In addition, SEM results indicated that TGase-modified films had more smooth and compact microstructures, especially at high glycerol contents (30-40%). (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据