4.7 Article

Mucoadhesion: A food perspective

期刊

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
卷 72, 期 -, 页码 281-296

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.05.043

关键词

-

资金

  1. BBSRC CASE studentships [BB/K012029/1, BB/L016885/1]
  2. McCormick (UK) Ltd [BB/K012029/1]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [1366930, 1502906] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of mucoadhesion in the perception and sensory characterisation of food products is becoming more apparent. Traditionally, mucoadhesives are used to enhance drug permeability and retention at mucosal membranes in the body, by adherence to a mucosal membrane formed through various interactions between the mucoadhesive and proteins present in the mucosa. Many polysaccharides used in the food industry as thickeners, emulsifiers, stabilisers and fat replacers also have mucoadhesive properties, and are commonly used in the pharmaceutical industry in drug formulations. More recently, there has been an increasing interest in utilising these polysaccharides as mucoadhesives to modulate the organoleptic properties of food. This review reflects on the recent developments in mucoadhesion and the limited research into the impact of mucoadhesion when designing food formulations and modifying the organoleptic properties of food. It will also outline the areas of food science that could benefit from an understanding of mucoadhesion, mainly focusing on developing an understanding of how mucoadhesion may explain results found from sensory studies involving polysaccharides. Furthermore, possible negative impacts of mucoadhesion in foodstuff will be explored. An overview of methods for the measurement of mucoadhesion is also provided. An understanding of the mucoadhesive nature of polysaccharides may be useful to the food industry with regard to new product design. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据