3.8 Article

Mining tourists' destinations and preferences through LSTM-based text classification and spatial clustering using Flickr data

期刊

SPATIAL INFORMATION RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 6, 页码 825-839

出版社

SPRINGER SINGAPORE PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s41324-021-00397-3

关键词

Tourism category; Topic modeling; LSTM based text classification; Spatial clustering; Flickr

资金

  1. Technology Advancement Research Program - Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korean government [20CTAP-C151886-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study classified Flickr data using topic modeling and deep learning, determined attractions and factors for each tourism category through spatial clustering analysis. The research revealed differences in attractive factors for each tourism category, providing insights into analyzing tourists' preferences in detail.
Recently, a large volume of data related social network service (SNS) is being produced as mobile devices are evolved and SNS is being used ubiquitously. People usually refer to social media when choosing tourist destinations and deciding on tourism activities. Flickr data has been widely utilized in the study of tourism. However, existing studies have limitations in covering the characteristics of tourism activities. In this study we initially developed a tourism category with topic modeling, classified Flickr text data with long short term memory (LSTM) according to the tourism category, and then derived region of attractions (ROA) of each tourism category by spatial clustering analysis, and finally identified attractive factors for each ROA. In this study, we derived nine tourism categories and found that the attractive factors for each ROA were different for each of tourism categories. This study is significant in that it is possible to analyze tourists' preferences in detail by combining deep learning-based text classification and spatial data analysis. In addition, framework and findings proposed in this study can be applied in other urban studies as well as tourism management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据