4.6 Article

Circular Split Ring Resonator (C-SRR) Array Integrated Frequency-Notched Horn-Filtenna With Wide and Strong Rejection Band

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 52664-52671

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3069701

关键词

Horn antennas; Resonant frequency; Resonator filters; Receiving antennas; Gain; Capacitance; Wideband; Split ring resonator (SRR); horn; filtenna; frequency notch; co; and cross-polar gain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A wideband notched filtering horn antenna integrated with a linear array of C-SRRs is proposed in this article, providing strong rejection-band capabilities. The staggered arrangement of multiple C-SRRs allows for wideband notch filtering response. The proposed antenna maintains the impedance and radiation characteristics of the standalone horn antenna in the pass band while efficiently suppressing co- and cross-polar peaks in the notch-band.
Linear-array of circular split ring resonators (C-SRR) integrated wideband notched filtering horn antenna with very strong rejection-band is proposed in this article. The linear C-SRR array, consisting of 3-sub arrays each having 4 identical C-SRR-elements, is printed on a dielectric substrate and is integrated into the throat or waveguide-section of the standard X-band horn (Narada 641). Staggered arrangement of the multiple C-SRRs based in-line filter contributes to the wideband notch filtering response with measured rejection band (S-11 < 3-dB) of 315 MHz in proposed horn-filtenna. The realized horn-filtenna yields co- and cross- polar peak gain suppression of 35.42 dB and 24.6 dB at and around the centre of notch-band (9.8 GHz) while at the pass band of the C-SRR filter, the proposed antenna inherits the impedance and radiation characteristics of the standalone horn antenna. The proposed technique is simple, easy to integrate and can be used to eliminate adjacent band noise/interference for faithful reception of data without using any additional filter section.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据