4.1 Article

Evaluation of Risk Factors for Adverse Functional Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Previous Transurethral Surgery of the Prostate

期刊

UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS
卷 105, 期 5-6, 页码 408-413

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000513657

关键词

Erectile dysfunction; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Urinary incontinence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A history of transurethral surgery of the prostate is considered a risk factor for adverse functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy. The time interval between transurethral desobstruction and prostatectomy significantly influences postoperative urinary incontinence rates.
Introduction: A history of transurethral surgery of the prostate is generally considered as a risk factor of adverse functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). We tested whether the risk of postoperative urinary incontinence (UIC) and erectile dysfunction (ED) after RP could be further substantiated in such patients. Materials and Methods: We tested the effect of the following variables on UIC and ED rates 1 year after RP: residual prostate volume after transurethral desobstruction, the time from transurethral desobstruction to RP, the type of transurethral desobstruction (TURP vs. laser enucleation), age, and nerve-sparing surgery (yes vs. no). UIC was defined as usage of any pad except a safety pad. ED was defined as no sexual intercourse possible. Results: Overall, 216 patients treated with RP between 2010 and 2019 in a tertiary care center were evaluated. All patients had previously undergone transurethral desobstruction. Regarding UIC analyses, only time from transurethral desobstruction to RP significantly influenced UIC rates (p = 0.003). Regarding ED rates, none of the tested variables reached statistical significance. Conclusion: The risk of UIC and ED after RP is substantial in men who had previously undergone transurethral desobstruction. The time from transurethral desobstruction to RP significantly impacts on the postoperative UIC rates. This observation should be further explored in future studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据