4.7 Article

Dynamic analysis of growth of Salmonella Enteritidis in liquid egg whites

期刊

FOOD CONTROL
卷 80, 期 -, 页码 125-130

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.04.044

关键词

Dynamic modeling; Salmonella Enteritidis; Liquid egg whites; One-step dynamic analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) is a common foodborne pathogen associated with eggs and egg products. This research was conducted to study the kinetics of growth and survival of SE in liquid egg whites (LEW). A dynamic temperature profile that exposed SE to suboptimal temperatures and below the minimum growth temperature (T-min,) was used with two isothermal conditions to develop kinetic models. One-step dynamic analysis was used to directly construct a tertiary model for describing the growth and survival of SE and determine the kinetic parameters. The results of kinetic analysis showed that the T-min was 7.7 degrees C and SE may die off at a rate of 2.78 x 10(-3) log CFU/ml per h per degrees C below the T-min. The root mean square error (RMSE) of the model was 0.5 log CFU/ml, with 76.6% of the residual errors within +/- 0.5 log CFU/ml of the experimental observations. The model was validated under both dynamic temperature and isothermal conditions. Both growth and survival of SE was accurately predicted, with the RMSE of validation at < 0.5 log CFU/ml. For all the validation tests, nearly 75% of the residual errors were within +/- 0.5 log CFU/ml of the experimental observations. This study clearly demonstrated that the one-step dynamic analysis method is an accurate and efficient method for direct construction of predictive models and estimation of the associated kinetic parameters that govern the growth and survival of microorganisms in food. Since the mathematical model has been validated, it can be used to predict the growth and survival of SE in LEW during storage and distribution and for conducting risk assessment of this microorganism. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据