4.7 Article

Qualitative and quantitative analysis of peanut adulteration in almond powder samples using multi-elemental fingerprinting combined with multivariate data analysis methods

期刊

FOOD CONTROL
卷 82, 期 -, 页码 31-41

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.06.014

关键词

Adulteration; Almond; Peanut; Multi-elemental fingerprinting; PCA-LDA; LS-SVM

资金

  1. University of Zanjan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, adulteration of almond powder samples with peanut was analyzed using multi-elemental fingerprinting based on inductively coupled plasma optical emission measurements (ICP-OES) combined with chemometric methods. The ability of multivariate data analysis approaches, such as principal component analysis (PCA) and principal component analysis-linear discriminant analysis (PCA-LDA), to achieve differentiation of samples and as partial least squares (PLS) and least squares support vector machine (LS-SVM), to quantify the adulteration based on the elemental contents has been investigated. Ten variables i.e. the contents of B, Na, Mg, K, Ca, Fe, Cu, Cu, Zn and Sr at mu g g(-1) level, determined by ICP-OES were used. Different almond and peanut samples were then mixed at various ratios to obtain mixtures ranging from 95/5 to 5/95 w/w and PCA-LDA was applied to classify the almonds, peanuts and adulterated samples. This method was able to differentiate peanut and almond samples from the adulterated samples. PLS and LS-SVM models were developed to quantify the adulteration ratios of almond using a training set and the constructed models were evaluated using a validation set. The root mean squared error of prediction (RMSEP) and the coefficient of determination (R-2) of the validation set for PLS and LS-SVM were 3.81, 0.986 and 1.66, 0.997, respectively, which demonstrates the superiority of the LS-SVM model. The results show that the combination of multi-elemental fingerprinting with multivariate data analysis methods can be applied as an effective and feasible method for testing almond adulteration. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据