4.1 Article

Effect of annealing on HTS tapes with a cerium oxide layer inserted between the REBaCuO and silver layers

期刊

MATERIALIA
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtla.2021.101029

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a study on HTS coated conductor samples with added CeOx layer, showing a clear degradation of the superconducting layer in samples with thicker CeOx layer after annealing at 450 degrees C. EDS analysis reveals a reduction in barium content in the superconducting layer, which may explain the decrease in critical current observed.
This paper presents extensive electrical, microstructural and chemical characterizations of HTS coated conductor samples in which an oxide layer (CeOx) has been added between the superconductor (GdBaCuO) and the silver (Ag) layers, in an attempt to increase the interfacial resistance between these two conductive layers. This increase of interfacial resistance is required to realize the current flow diverter (CFD) architecture in HTS tapes. All samples in this paper have been characterized before and after performing an annealing in oxygen atmosphere. The purpose of the annealing was to reduce the interfacial resistance generated by the CeOx layer, in order to achieve a proper value for the CFD architecture. Samples with different thicknesses of CeOx, namely 0, 10, 35 and 100 nm, have been produced and characterized. The critical current and the critical temperature have been measured to determine the quality of the superconducting layers, while cross-section transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) have been used to monitor the impact of the annealing. The results show a clear degradation of the superconducting layer for samples with a thick layer (>= 35 nm) of CeOx after annealing at 450 degrees C. According to the EDS results, a reduction of the amount of barium is observed in the superconducting layer, which could explain the observed reduction of the critical current.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据