4.8 Article

DDX3 depletion represses translation of mRNAs with complex 5′ UTRs

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 9, 页码 5336-5350

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab287

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of California, San Francisco Program for Breakthrough Biomedical Research, Sandler Foundation
  2. California Tobacco-Related Disease Research Grants Program [27KT-0003, T30DT1004]
  3. National Institutes of Health [DP2GM132932, F32GM133144]
  4. DFG Priority Project [SPP1935]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DDX3 is an RNA chaperone that regulates translation by affecting a subset of mRNAs. The specific set of mRNAs regulated by DDX3 and its relationship with activity are still unknown. This study defines the subset of the transcriptome responsive to DDX3 inhibition, with implications for basic biology and disease states involving altered DDX3.
DDX3 is an RNA chaperone of the DEAD-box family that regulates translation. Ded1, the yeast ortholog of DDX3, is a global regulator of translation, whereas DDX3 is thought to preferentially affect a subset of mRNAs. However, the set of mRNAs that are regulated by DDX3 are unknown, along with the relationship between DDX3 binding and activity. Here, we use ribosome profiling, RNA-seq, and PAR-CLIP to define the set of mRNAs that are regulated by DDX3 in human cells. We find that while DDX3 binds highly expressed mRNAs, depletion of DDX3 particularly affects the translation of a small subset of the transcriptome. We further find that DDX3 binds a site on helix 16 of the human ribosomal rRNA, placing it immediately adjacent to the mRNA entry channel. Translation changes caused by depleting DDX3 levels or expressing an inactive point mutation are different, consistent with different association of these genetic variant types with disease. Taken together, this work defines the subset of the transcriptome that is responsive to DDX3 inhibition, with relevance for basic biology and disease states where DDX3 is altered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据