4.6 Article

The role of conformational heterogeneity in the excited state dynamics of linked diketopyrrolopyrrole dimers†

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 23, 期 15, 页码 9357-9364

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1cp00541c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Computational Merit Allocation Scheme [fk5]
  2. Research Platform Services (ResPlat) at The University of Melbourne [punim0094]
  3. Australian Research Council through the Centre of Excellence in Exciton Science [CE170100026]
  4. Australian Research Council [LE200100051]
  5. Australian Research Council [LE200100051] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the charge-separated state in DPP derivatives is an important intermediate, which requires suitably aligned dimers for its formation. This serves as an alternative relaxation pathway for the excitation energy.
Diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP) derivatives have been proposed for both singlet fission and energy upconversion as they meet the energetic requirements and exhibit superior photostability compared to many other chromophores. In this study, both time-resolved electronic and IR spectroscopy have been applied to investigate excited state relaxation processes competing with fission in dimers of DPP derivatives with varying linker structures. A charge-separated (CS) state is shown to be an important intermediate with dynamics that are both solvent and linker dependent. The CS state is found for a subset of the total population of excited molecules and it is proposed that CS state formation requires suitably aligned dimers within a broader distribution of conformations available in solution. No long-lived triplet signatures indicative of singlet fission were detected, with the CS state likely acting as an alternative relaxation pathway for the excitation energy. This study provides insight into the role of molecular conformation in determining excited state relaxation pathways in DPP dimer systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据