4.7 Article

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for meat analysis

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 221, 期 -, 页码 1253-1257

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.032

关键词

Genomic DNA extraction; Meat and meat products; Adulteration; Spectrophotometric analysis; Fluorometric analysis; qPCR; Biometrology

资金

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
  2. National Metrology Institute of Turkey
  3. TUBITAK UME, Production of reference material for identification of meat species Project [G3BA-E1-01-I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Preventing adulteration of meat and meat products with less desirable or objectionable meat species is important not only for economical, religious and health reasons, but also, it is important for fair trade practices, therefore, several methods for identification of meat and meat products have been developed. In the present study, ten different DNA extraction methods, including Tris-EDTA Method, a modified Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide (CTAB) Method, Alkaline Method, Urea Method, Salt Method, Guanidinium Isothiocyanate (GuSCN) Method, Wizard Method, Qiagen Method, Zymogen Method and Genespin Method were examined to determine their relative effectiveness for extracting DNA from meat samples. The results show that the salt method is easy to perform, inexpensive and environmentally friendly. Additionally, it has the highest yield among all the isolation methods tested. We suggest this method as an alternative method for DNA isolation from meat and meat products. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据