4.7 Article

SPS-Net: Self-Attention Photometric Stereo Network

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2020.3047917

关键词

Attention mechanism; deep learning; photometric stereo

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51805078]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0304200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, a self-attention photometric stereo network (SPS-Net) is proposed to exploit information in all three dimensions without violating natural characters. The SPS-Net achieved higher performance than state-of-the-art algorithms in photometric stereo tasks with dense lightings and also outperformed benchmarks in sparse and light-information-robust photometric stereo tasks.
The input data of photometric stereo have three dimensions: one photometric dimension of different lights and two spatial dimensions, i.e., rows and columns in the image coordinate. Recent deep-learning-based photometric stereo algorithms usually use 2-D/3-D convolutions to process the input with three dimensions. Assumptions that violate the natural characters of photometric stereo problem, e.g., spatial pixel interdependence and light permutation invariance, have to be made due to the dimension mismatch. In this article, we propose a self-attention photometric stereo network (SPS-Net), which can exploit the information in all three dimensions without violating these natural characters. In SPS-Net, the spatial information is extracted by convolutional layers and the photometric information is aggregated by the proposed photometric fusion blocks based on the self-attention mechanism. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world data sets are conducted. The proposed SPS-Net achieved higher performance than the state-of-the-art algorithms photometric stereo task with dense lightings. Without any changes, the proposed algorithm also outperformed the benchmarks in sparse and light-information-robust photometric stereo tasks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据