4.5 Article

Introduction: policy integration and institutional capacity: theoretical, conceptual and empirical challenges

期刊

POLICY AND SOCIETY
卷 40, 期 1, 页码 1-18

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1080/14494035.2021.1902058

关键词

Policy integration; institutional capacity; policy change; policy design

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the different dimensions of institutional capacity and its linkage with policy integration in order to reduce conceptual and analytical fragmentation in the field. It also addresses the challenges of studying institutional capacities for policy integration and suggests future research directions and policy-relevant recommendations.
The issue of institutional capacity has received increased attention in the research on policy integration, bringing about the proliferation of conceptions aimed at capturing the linkage between cross-sectoral aspects of policy designs and the specific attributes that governmental institutions and processes should possess in order to effectively formulate and implement integrated policies. This article contributes to reducing conceptual and analytical fragmentation in this field by elaborating on the different dimensions which compose the broadly defined 'institutional capacity' and outlining its link with policy integration. More specifically, our objective is threefold. First, we elaborate on the theoretical and conceptual accounts of institutional capacity with particular regard to integrated policy designs, suggesting an analytical framework that unpacks the different dimensions of institutional capacity through a range of empirical indicators. Second, we discuss the analytical, conceptual and empirical challenges that arise with the study of institutional capacities for policy integration, drawing also on the main findings provided by the contributions to the Thematic Issue. Third, we suggest some promising venues for future research and collect a number of policy-relevant recommendations on institutional capacity, policy integration and policy effectiveness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据