4.6 Article

Singlet oxygen vs. triplet oxygen: functions of 2D-MoO3 catalysts in conquering catastrophic parasitic-reactions in lithium- and sodium-oxygen batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 9, 期 16, 页码 10186-10198

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ta00699a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21878168, 21676154]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored the catalytic mechanism of 2D-MoO3 nanosheet in aprotic solvents to prevent singlet oxygen production and promote deep reduction of alkali-metal peroxides in alkali metal-oxygen batteries. This research may provide new insights for future research into highly reversible and efficient batteries in the field.
Aprotic electrolyte alkali metal-oxygen batteries that possess a higher energy density than lithium-ion batteries stand out as the most promising next-generation environmentally-friendly energy source. Parasitic reactions caused by the singlet oxygen released from the superoxide disproportionation reactions, however, lead to catastrophic fading in the battery cycle life. We attempted to seek a probable catalyst surmounting this dilemma and finally discovered the 2D-MoO3 nanosheet as an electrode-catalyst to handle the side reactions. Previous studies focused mainly on the influence of solvents on side reactions and neglected the catalyst, and hence, in this research an innovative mechanism of battery reaction occurring on the 2D-MoO3 nanosheet in aprotic solvents was fully explored from both thermodynamic and kinetic prospects. It is interesting to find that the 2D-MoO3 nanosheet plays different roles in preventing the production of singlet oxygen in lithium- and sodium-oxygen batteries. The 2D-MoO3 nanosheet could also trigger the deep reduction of alkali-metal peroxides, which is considered to be an effective method to avoid parasitic reactions. This work may shed new light on future research into highly reversible and efficient alkali metal-oxygen batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据