4.4 Article

Biomarker Discovery and Outcomes for Comprehensive Cell-Free Circulating Tumor DNA Versus Standard-of-Care Tissue Testing in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

期刊

JCO PRECISION ONCOLOGY
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 93-102

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/PO.20.00241

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that comprehensive cfDNA testing is as effective as tissue testing in detecting guideline-recommended biomarkers in aNSCLC. First-line therapy based on cfDNA produced similar outcomes to tissue-based testing, highlighting the clinical utility of comprehensive cfDNA genotyping as an initial modality in treatment-naive aNSCLC patients.
PURPOSE Treatment guidelines for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) recommend broad molecular profiling for targeted therapy selection. This study prospectively assessed comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) of cell-free circulating tumor DNA (cfDNA) compared with standard-of-care (SOC) tissue-based testing to identify guideline-recommended alterations in aNSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with treatment-naive aNSCLC were tested using a well-validated NGS cfDNA panel, and results were compared with SOC tissue testing. The primary objective was noninferiority of cfDNA vs. tissue analysis for the detection of two guideline-recommended biomarkers (EGFRandALK) and an additional six actionable biomarkers. Secondary analyses included tissue versus cfDNA biomarker discovery, overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) to targeted therapy, and positive predictive value (PPV) of cfDNA. RESULTS The primary objective was met with cfDNA identifying actionable mutations in 46 patients versus 48 by tissue (P< .05). In total, 0/186 patients were genotyped for all eight biomarkers with tissue, compared with 90.8% using cfDNA. Targetable alterations orKRASwere identified in 80.7% when cfDNA was used first versus 57.1% when tissue was used first. PPV for cfDNA-detectedEGFRwas 100.0% (25/25). ORR and PFS in patients receiving targeted therapy based on tissue or cfDNA were similar to those previously reported. CONCLUSION This prospective study confirms a previous report that comprehensive cfDNA testing is noninferior to SOC tissue testing in detecting aNSCLC-recommended biomarkers. Furthermore, cfDNA-based first-line therapy produced outcomes similar to tissue-based testing, demonstrating the clinical utility of comprehensive cfDNA genotyping as the initial genotyping modality in patients with treatment-naive aNSCLC when tissue is insufficient or when all actionable biomarkers cannot be rapidly assessed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据