4.6 Article

Implementation of a complex intervention to improve hospital discharge: process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial

期刊

BMJ OPEN
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049872

关键词

general medicine (see internal medicine); quality in health care; public health; qualitative research

资金

  1. National Research Programme 'Smarter Health Care' (NRP74) by the Swiss National Science Foundation [407440_167193]
  2. University of Zurich
  3. University Hospital Zurich
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [407440_167193] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study implemented a cluster randomised controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a medication review and communication stimulus between hospital physicians and general practitioners on rehospitalisation of multimorbid older patients. Results showed successful recruitment of hospitals, high intervention dose but limited fidelity, and challenges in patient recruitment and retention.
Objectives To study the implementation of a cluster randomised controlled effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial testing the effectiveness of a medication review at hospital discharge combined with a communication stimulus between hospital physicians (HPs) and general practitioners (GPs) on rehospitalisation of multimorbid older patients. Design Extension of Grant's mixed method process evaluation framework to trials with multilevel clustering. Setting General internal medicine wards in Swiss hospitals. Participants Convenience samples of 15 chief physicians (of 21 hospitals participating in the effectiveness trial), 60 (74) senior HPs, 65 (164) junior HPs and 187 (411) GPs. Implementation strategy Two-hour teaching sessions for senior HPs on a patient-centred, checklist-guided discharge routine. Process evaluation components Data collection on recruitment, delivery and response from chief physicians (semistructured interviews), senior HPs, junior HPs, GPs (surveys) and patients (via HPs). Quantitative data were summarised using descriptive statistics, and interviews analysed using thematic analysis. Outcome measures Intervention dose (quantitative), implementation fidelity (qualitative), feasibility and acceptability, facilitators and barriers, implementation support strategies. Results Recruitment of hospitals was laborious but successful, with 21 hospitals recruited. Minimal workload and a perceived benefit for the clinic were crucial factors for participation. Intervention dose was high (95% of checklist activities carried out), but intervention fidelity was limited (discharge letters) or unknown (medication review). Recruitment and retention of patients was challenging, partly due to patient characteristics (old, frail) and the COVID-19 pandemic: Only 612 of the anticipated 2100 patients were recruited, and 31% were lost to follow-up within the first month after discharge. The intervention was deemed feasible and helpful by HPs, and the relevance of the topic appreciated by both HPs and GPs. Conclusions The results from this evaluation will support interpretation of the findings of the effectiveness study and may inform researchers and policy makers who aim at improving hospital discharge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据