4.4 Article

Feral horses (Equus caballus) increase suspended sediment in subalpine streams

期刊

MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH
卷 72, 期 9, 页码 1290-1302

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/MF20353

关键词

suspended sediment; turbidity; riparian damage; stream ecology; feral horses

资金

  1. Department of Planning, Industry and Environment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Feral horses preferentially use aquatic landscape elements, potentially degrading water quality and affecting aquatic ecosystems. Their interactions with streams can lead to increased turbidity, posing a risk to aquatic diversity and ecosystem function, with even low levels of horse presence impacting subalpine waterways.
Feral horses preferentially utilise aquatic landscape elements. Damage to stream banks by feral horses potentially degrades water quality and affects aquatic ecosystems. Despite the global predominance of horse activity in or near water, there is poor understanding of in-stream impacts. Motion-sensing cameras were used near subalpine streams to quantify frequency and behaviour of horses interacting with streams. Deployed turbidity loggers were used to indicate the presence of suspended sediment from interactions and to assess long-term (3 year) seasonal suspended sediment regime at sites with very small and large amounts of horse activity. In summer, 99.9% of large grazer interactions with streams were horses and we estimate 130 horse interactions per kilometre of stream per day, resulting in stream turbidity increases up to 100 NTU. Long-term turbidity at sites with greater riparian damage from horses was significantly greater than at control sites. Turbidity in horse-affected streams peaked at 50 times the national turbidity guideline and, in summer, averaged eight times the guideline. Suspended sediment leads to a high risk of loss of aquatic diversity and impairment of ecosystem function. Linear relationships between turbidity and riparian damage suggest that any level of horse presence affects subalpine waterways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据