4.7 Article

Tailored dealloying-driven, graphene-boosted defective rutile TiO2-x for long-term lithium storage

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
卷 5, 期 7, 页码 3226-3235

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1qm00188d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52002076]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [20ZR1403300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TiO2 lattices can be used as a promising anode alternative in lithium-ion batteries by self-doping Ti3+ and/or inducing an oxygen defect-induced impurity level. A low-temperature dealloying approach, involving an oxidation-reduction mechanism, is proposed to synthesize blue defective rutile TiO2-x. The TiO2-x/graphene composites exhibit desirable lithium storage capacities and outstanding long-term cycling stability.
Ti3+ self-doping and/or an oxygen defect-induced impurity level in TiO2 lattices can serve as charge transfer carriers to accelerate electronic conduction, enabling TiO2 to be a promising anode alternative in lithium-ion batteries. Although previously reported post-reduction of Ti(iv) intermediates and direct oxidation of Ti(ii) precursors can be used to prepare defective rutile TiO2, these processes usually require elevated temperatures. Herein, a tailored low-temperature dealloying approach, involving a new in situ oxidation-reduction mechanism, is proposed to synthesize blue defective rutile TiO2-x directly. The generated air-sensitive Ti3+ species on the surface are then handily stabilized by coupling with graphene. As a result, the TiO2-x/graphene composites exhibit desirable lithium storage capacities and outstanding long-term cycling stability (157 mA h g(-1) at 1C after 1400 cycles) owing to the [001]-axis oriented nanorod self-assembly, faster electron transfer, and improved Li+ diffusivity. This work highlights a new formation mechanism of defective rutile TiO2-x, and considering the convenience and simplicity, it will provide new inspiration to the conventional dealloying strategy for low-temperature synthetic chemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据