4.6 Article

Concurrent validity and expanded interpretation of the M5-50

期刊

CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY
卷 40, 期 4, 页码 1779-1787

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-018-0106-2

关键词

IPIP; NEO-PI-3; M5– 50; Personality; Five-factor model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the concurrent validity of the M5-50 by correlating it to the proprietary NEO-PI-3, and also correlates the M5-50 domains with well-documented relationships with religious fundamentalism. The study finds that the M5-50 domains align well with certain facets in the NEO-PI-3, and also identifies relationships between M5-50 domains and religious fundamentalism. Recommendations for interpretation and future development of brief, IPIP-based Openness to Experience domains are discussed.
The M5-50 is a brief 50 item international personality item pool public-domain five-factor model personality instrument. While public-domain instruments can facilitate social justice by allowing access to instruments to those who may not have the financial resources to use a pay-to-use instrument, public-domain measures may lack the scrutiny given to pay-to-use instruments. This study provides scrutiny through examining the concurrent validity evidence of the M5-50 by correlating it to the proprietary NEO-PI-3. Additionally, to provide additional validity, this study also correlates the M5-50 domains with well-documented relationships with religious fundamentalism. Regarding the NEO-PI-3, the domains of Neuroticism and Conscientiousness appear to well represent their NEO-PI-3 domain counterparts, whereas Extraversion and Agreeableness had weak relationships with some facet-level content. Openness to Experience on the M5-50 appears able to align with both the Openness/Intellect model and a unified domain structure suggested by traditional five-factor model literature as M5-50 domains and items most strongly correlate with the Aesthetics and Ideas facets in the NEO-PI-3 Openness domain. Regarding religious fundamentalism, the M5-50 domain of Openness had an inverse relationship with fundamentalism, while extraversion had a positive relationship with fundamentalism. Interpretive recommendations for the M5-50 and recommendations for future development of brief, IPIP-based Openness to Experience domains are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据