4.5 Article

The sine-Gordon expansion method for higher-dimensional NLEEs and parametric analysis

期刊

HELIYON
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06459

关键词

The sine-Gordon expansion method; Estevez-Mansfield-Clarkson equation; Riemann wave equation; Soliton solutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The EMC equation and the RW equation are important mathematical models in various fields, with the SGE method being developed to study higher-dimensional NLEEs. The extended SGE method successfully found multiple soliton solutions for these equations, showing that the solutions' characteristics are influenced by parameter choices. This study may have significant implications for analyzing higher-dimensional NLEEs.
The Estevez-Mansfield-Clarkson (EMC) equation and the (2+1)-dimensional Riemann wave (RW) equation are important mathematical models in nonlinear science, engineering and mathematical physics which have remarkable applications in the field of plasma physics, fluid dynamics, optics, image processing etc. Generally,through the sine-Gordon expansion (SGE) method only the lower-dimensional nonlinear evolution equations (NLEEs) are examined. However, the method has not yet been extended of finding solutions to the higher-dimensional NLEEs. In this article, the SGE method has been developed to rummage the higher-dimensional NLEEs and established steady soliton solutions to the earlier stated NLEEs by putting in use the extended higher-dimensional sine-Gordon expansion method. Scores of soliton solutions are figure out which confirms the compatibility of the extended SGE method. The solutions are analyzed for both lower and higher-dimensional nonlinear evolution equations through sketching graphs for alternative values of the associated parameters. From the figures it is notable to perceive that the characteristic of the solutions depend upon the choice of the parameters. This study might play an impactful role in analyzing higher-dimensional NLEEs through the extended SGE approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据