4.3 Review

In situ electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy for catalysis

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS METHODS PRIMERS
卷 1, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s43586-021-00031-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. Alexander von Humboldt foundation
  2. Max Planck Society
  3. BMBF EPR-on-a-Chip network project [03SF0565]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In situ catalysis studies using electron paramagnetic resonance provide insight into species under reaction conditions, helping to elucidate reaction mechanisms and optimize catalyst reactivity. This method is applicable in various areas such as high-temperature gas-solid reactions, molecular catalysis, photocatalysis, and electrocatalysis, with a focus on unraveling catalytic mechanisms.
In situ catalysis studies seek insight into species present under reaction conditions to elucidate reaction mechanisms and understand the atomistic details of the active catalyst, both of which are key to optimizing catalyst reactivity and processes. Many reactions follow radical mechanisms, and many catalysts adopt paramagnetic states within their catalytic cycles where the systems exhibit species with unpaired electrons, which provide a sensitive handle to probe their geometric and electronic structure. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy directly probes these unpaired electrons to characterize molecular radicals as well as determine transition metal ion oxidation states and coordination geometries. Here, we introduce the concept of EPR followed by the methodology for in situ EPR studies and discuss high-temperature gas-solid reactions, molecular catalysis, photocatalysis and electrocatalysis. The broad applicability of the approaches is demonstrated through case studies in each area, with a focus on unravelling catalytic mechanisms. We also discuss data sharing and reproducibility issues as well as limitations to the technique. Finally, we identify directions for development to guide interested researchers towards evolving areas including miniaturization and high-frequency analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据