4.7 Article

Biocompatible, flexible and conductive polymers prepared by biomass-derived ionic liquid treatment

期刊

POLYMER CHEMISTRY
卷 12, 期 14, 页码 2115-2121

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1py00064k

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a biomass-derived ionic liquid ([CA][ChCl]) was used as an effective conductivity enhancer for PEDOT:PSS, resulting in improved conductivity and structural changes. Hydration of the post-treatment reagent led to better phase segregation between PEDOT and PSS, morphological changes, and enhancements in conductivity, flexibility, hydrophobicity, and environmental stability.
Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) is a promising, biocompatible conductive polymer for bio-integrated electronics with health-care applications. However, the intrinsic biocompatibility of PEDOT:PSS is potentially jeopardized by additives or post-treatment with toxic ionic liquids used to enhance electrical conductivity. In this work, a biomass-derived ionic liquid ([CA][ChCl]) based on citric acid and choline chloride was employed as an effective conductivity enhancer. Conductivities of 1320 S cm(-1) were achieved by post-treatment with this ionic liquid. Hydrated-[CA][ChCl]-induced changes in the structure and electronic properties of PEDOT:PSS as observed by XRD, XPS, FTIR-ATR, UV-vis NIR, RAMAN spectroscopy, AFM and cyclic voltammetry. This characterization indicated more effective phase segregation between PEDOT and PSS, removal of PSS and a morphological change from core-shell grains to more interconnected fibres with concomitant improvement of electrical conductivity, flexibility, hydrophobicity and environmental stability. Hydration of the post-treatment reagent [CA][ChCl] to a mole fraction of 0.57 resulted in much reduced viscosity and greater efficacy. These results demonstrate hydrated biomass-derived ionic liquids be an effective biocompatible alternative to conventional post-treatments for the development of wearable PEDOT:PSS health-care devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据