4.7 Article

Smart NMR Method of Measurement of Moisture Content of Vegetables During Microwave Vacuum Drying

期刊

FOOD AND BIOPROCESS TECHNOLOGY
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 2251-2260

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11947-017-1991-3

关键词

Microwave vacuum drying; NMR; Moisture content; Signal amplitude; Smart

资金

  1. China Key Research Program [2017YFD0400901]
  2. Jiangsu Province (China) Collaborative Innovation Center for Food Safety and Quality Control Industry Development Program
  3. Jiangsu Province (China) Infrastructure Project [BM2014051]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microwave drying is usually combined with vacuum environment in conjunction with hot air flow to draw the moisture rapidly. The moisture content of the vegetables undergoing drying is hard to measure online. This research designed a microwave vacuum drying (MVD)-low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) smart device and investigated the feasibility of NMR method for online measurement of state of moisture during MVD. The relation between the signal amplitude (A (2)) and the true moisture content (M (1)) of six kinds of vegetables (mushroom, carrot, potato, lotus, edamame, vegetable corn) was fitted to estimate if NMR can measure the M (1) of vegetables directly. Results showed that A (2) and M (1) of different fresh vegetables had no single empirical mathematical model to fit. However, for each kind of these vegetables, the A (2) and corresponding M (1) in different MVD stages showed a significant linear relationship. The predicted moisture content (M (2)) of mushroom: M (2) = 5.25351 x 10(-4) A (2) - 0.34042, R = 0.996; carrot: M (2) = 5.78756 x 10(-4) A (2) - 0.14108, R = 0.998; potato: M (2) = 3.10019 x 10(-4) A (2) - 0.10612, R = 0.991; lotus: M (2) = 2.32415 x 10(-4) A (2) - 0.01573, R = 0.998; edamame: M (2) = 3.13310 x 10(-4) A (2) - 0.4198, R = 0.996; vegetable corn: M (2) = 1.69461 x 10(-4) A (2) - 0.09063, R = 0.995. The linear models between M (2) and A (2) were able to estimate the end point (M (1) < 8%) of MVD with a high accuracy (P > 0.950).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据