4.2 Article

Wastewater-Based Epidemiology for Managing the COVID-19 Pandemic

期刊

ACS ES&T WATER
卷 1, 期 6, 页码 1352-1362

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsestwater.1c00050

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Chicago
  2. Walder Foundation grant
  3. University of Chicago Big Ideas Generator grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Testing wastewater for SARS-CoV-2 provides information on disease prevalence, infection trends, hot spots, and helps decision makers. Studies also examine virus survivability in different water matrices, the impact of wastewater treatment processes, and the potential of wastewater-based epidemiology.
SARS-CoV-2 is shed by COVID-19 patients and can be detected in wastewater. Thus, testing wastewater for the virus provides a depiction of disease prevalence in a community. Virus concentration data can be utilized to monitor infection trends, identify hot spots, and inform decision makers regarding reopening efforts and directing resources. This perspective aims to shed light on the current situation relating to SARS-CoV-2 in the wastewater system and the opportunity to utilize wastewater to collect useful epidemiological data. First, the survivability of SARS-CoV-2 in different water matrices is examined through the lens of surrogate viruses. Second, the effect of wastewater treatment processes on SARS-CoV-2 is investigated. Current standards for sufficient reduction of the virus and the risk of exposure that arises at each stage in the wastewater treatment process are discussed. Third, the immense potential of wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) for managing the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is analyzed. Studies that have tested wastewater or sludge for SARS-CoV-2 are discussed, and results are tabulated. Lastly, the current limitations of WBE and opportunities of future research are explored. Using the wealth of knowledge that the scientific community now has about WBE, wastewater testing should be considered by regional governments and private institutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据