3.8 Review

Monitoring the Patient Following Radio-Cephalic Arteriovenous Fistula Creation: Current Perspectives

期刊

VASCULAR HEALTH AND RISK MANAGEMENT
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 111-121

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/VHRM.S205130

关键词

arteriovenous fistula maturation; hemodialysis; early failure; rule of six; vascular access

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The autogenous radial-cephalic direct wrist arteriovenous fistula is the gold standard for dialysis vascular access, but has a high non-maturation rate. Early identification and treatment of non-maturation problems are crucial for improving surgical success.
Autogenous radial-cephalic direct wrist arteriovenous fistula (RC-AVF) in the non-dominant arm is the gold standard for dialysis vascular access. However, the RC-AVF non-maturation rate is significant (similar or equal to 40%) due to an increasingly elderly and comorbid population incidence. A detailed identification of the biological cascade underlying arteriovenous fistula (AVF) maturation could be the key to clinical research aimed at identify the group of patients at risk of primary AVF failure. Currently, careful post-operative monitoring remains the most crucial aspect to overcome the problem of impaired maturation. Up to 80% of patients with immature RC-AVF have problems potentially solvable with early endovascular or surgical correction. Physical examination by experienced practitioners in conjunction with duplex ultrasound examination (DUS) can identify physical signs of non-maturation, understand the underlying cause, and drive for a tailored early planning to treat the complication. New approaches for the early assessment of AVF maturation are under study. Techniques to promote RC-AVF maturation performed through the administration of pre-or peri-operative drugs have missed up to now to prove an efficacy in improving fistula success. The new techniques tested after surgery appear to hold future promise for improving fistula maturation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据