The Most Vulnerable Poor: Clientelism Among Slum Dwellers

Are slum dwellers more involved in clientelistic arrangements than other (urban poor) voters? While poverty is a key predictor of clientelism, some urban poor voters are more involved in clientelistic arrangements than others. Insecure tenure, lack of access to public resources, and location in areas exposed to environmental shocks increase the vulnerability of slum dwellers. This vulnerability is used by politicians and brokers, who politicize access to scarce resources, and thus make slum dweller more exposed to clientelism. The qualitative literature has long highlighted how clientelism provides a strategy for slum dwellers to cope with their vulnerability, but this population is often excluded from quantitative analyses of clientelism. Using survey data from Argentina and a matching technique that allows us to compare slum dwellers with similar non-slum dwellers, we find that there is indeed a higher prevalence of clientelism among the former. We use a survey experiment on monitoring and sanctions to show that this different exposure to clientelism is consequential. We find different responses across similarly poor slum dwellers and non-slum dwellers regarding the potential consequences of defecting from clientelistic arrangements. Our findings suggest that including slum dwellers in quantitative analyses would improve our understanding of clientelism.

Automated summary

Due to factors such as insecure land tenure, lack of access to resources, and exposure to environmental shocks, slum dwellers are more vulnerable to clientelistic arrangements. This vulnerability is exploited by politicians and brokers to politicize resource access, leading to a higher prevalence of clientelism among slum dwellers than non-slum dwellers. Understanding the different responses to clientelistic arrangements between slum dwellers and non-slum dwellers could provide valuable insights into the dynamics of clientelism.