4.4 Article

Application of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy for the Detection of Metanil Yellow in Turmeric Powder

期刊

FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 1291-1302

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12161-017-1106-9

关键词

NIR spectroscopy; Turmeric powder; Metanil yellow powder; Regression analysis; Figures of merit; Net analyte signal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Turmeric (Curcumina Longa) is a globally traded commodity which is subjected to economically motivated chemically unsafe adulteration, namely metanil yellow. In this work, we report a simplistic and convenient approach to find the adulteration of turmeric with metanil yellow by near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy coupled with chemometrics. Pure turmeric sample was prepared in the laboratory and spiked with different concentrations of metanil yellow. The reflectance spectra of 248 pure turmeric, metanil yellow, and adulterated samples (1-25%) (w/w) were collected using NIR spectroscopy. The calibration models based on NIR spectra of 144 samples were built for two different regression models, principal component analysis (PCR), and partial least square (PLSR) methods. Another 72 samples were used for external validation. The coefficient of determination (R (2)) and root mean square error of calibration for validation and prediction were found to be 0.96-0.99, 0.44-0.91, respectively, for most of the results depending upon different pre-processing techniques and mathematical models used. The original reflectance spectra, the 1st derivative plot, the plot of PLSR regression coefficient (beta), and the first three principal component loadings revealed metanil-related absorption regions. To verify the robustness of the models, the figures of merit (FOM) of the models were calculated with the help of net analyte signal (NAS) theory. Overall, it was found that PLSR yielded superior results as compared to the PCR technique. These methods can be applied to other spices also to detect the adulteration rapidly and without any prior sample preparations and with low cost.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据