4.6 Article

An underestimated photoactive area in organic solar cells based on a ZnO interlayer

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 9, 期 35, 页码 11753-11760

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1tc00745a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51973031, 51933001]
  2. Shanghai Pujiang Program [19PJ1400500]
  3. NSFC [52073056]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [19ZR1401400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the impact of resistance of sol-gel grown ZnO interlayer on solar cell performance, revealing that UV-induced doping effect can lead to underestimation of photoactive area and overestimation of Jsc. The argument regarding high-resistance interlayers not leading to overestimated Jsc should be carefully evaluated.
Solution-processed ZnO is commonly used as a charge-selective interlayer between an absorber and electrode in organic solar cells. In this work, the impact of the resistance of the sol-gel grown ZnO interlayer on solar cell performance is investigated. We find that the UV-induced doping effect leads to a significantly reduced ZnO resistance, which gives rise to an underestimated photoactive area and thus overestimated short-circuit current density (J(sc)) for the solar cell measured without an aperture. Moreover, we show that this so far mostly overlooked issue can be unintentionally triggered during common fabrication and characterization processes, because the UV photons flux from a solar simulator, or from a light source for encapsulating the solar cell, are already sufficient in leading to the too much increased lateral conductivity of the ZnO. Finally, we demonstrate that interlayers with rather high sheet resistance can lead to an overestimation of J(sc) (e.g. by 10% for a 10 M omega per square interlayer in a 2 mm(2) device). Therefore, the validity of the argument that high-resistance interlayers do not lead to overestimated J(sc) should always be carefully evaluated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据