3.9 Article

Temperature analysis of a novel MAIB reactor during the treatment of wastewater from recycled paper mill

期刊

WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 592-604

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wpt.2021.023

关键词

anaerobic digestion (AD); mesophilic temperature; modified anaerobic inclining-baffled (MAIB) reactor; recycled paper mill wastewater (RPMW); thermophilic temperature

资金

  1. RU-I grant scheme [A/C. 1001/PJKIMIA/814148]
  2. iconic grant scheme by Universiti Sains Malaysia [A/C. 1001/CKT/870023]
  3. Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, College of Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that temperature plays a significant role in the removal of COD and methane production during the anaerobic digestion process of recycled paper mill wastewater.
Anaerobic digestion (AD) is an essential technology for wastewater management, resource recovery and biogas production, and it is considered as an efficient and reliable treatment method for many wastewaters. Operating parameters have been shown to directly affect the stability and treatment performance of AD, especially temperature. For 180 days, the AD of recycled paper mill wastewater (RPMW) was carried out in a modified anaerobic inclining-baffled (MAIB) reactor under various temperature conditions, i.e. 29 degrees C (low mesophilic), 37 degrees C (mesophilic) and 55 degrees C (thermophilic). It was found that total COD removal of 94, 96 and 76%, and methane yields of 0.125, 0.196 and 0.256 L CH4/g CODremoved were attained at temperatures of 29, 37 and 55 degrees C, respectively. Throughout the three transition periods, the pH level in the MAIB reactor fluctuated slightly within the range of 5.8-6.5 without affecting the system stability. The results concluded that thermophilic condition strongly influenced the MAIB reactor performance, leading to lower COD removal, higher methane yield and gradually recovered pH level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据