4.7 Article

A comparison of subjective and objective measures of physical activity from the Newcastle 85+study

期刊

AGE AND AGEING
卷 44, 期 4, 页码 691-694

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afv062

关键词

physical activity; accelerometry; self-report; questionnaire; 'aged 80 and over'; older people

资金

  1. UK Medical Research Council
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [G0500997]
  3. Dunhill Medical Trust [R124/0509]
  4. NHS North of Tyne (Newcastle Primary Care Trust)
  5. Medical Research Council [G0500997, G0700718, MR/J50001X/1, MR/K006312/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10260, SRF-2011-04-017] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. MRC [MR/K006312/1, MR/J50001X/1, G0500997, G0700718] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methods: A total of 484 participants aged 87-89 years recruited to the Newcastle 85+ study completed a purpose-designed physical activity questionnaire (PAQ), which categorised participants as mildly active, moderately active and very active. Out of them, 337 participants wore a triaxial, raw accelerometer on the right wrist over a 5-7-day period to obtain objective measures of rest/activity, PA intensity and PA type. Data from subjective and objective measurement methods were compared. Results: Self-reported PA was significantly associated with objective measures of the daily sedentary time, low-intensity PA and activity type classified as sedentary, activities of daily living and walking. Objective measures of PA were significantly different when low, moderate and high self-reported PA categories were compared (all P < 0.001). Conclusion: The Newcastle 85+ PAQ demonstrated convergent validity with objective measures of PA. Our findings suggest that this PAQ can be used in the very old to rank individuals according to their level of total PA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据