4.6 Article

Thermal conductivity and thermoelectric properties in 3D macroscopic pure carbon nanotube materials

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY REVIEWS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 178-186

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/ntrev-2021-0013

关键词

thermal conductivity; carbon nanotubes; thermoelectric properties; Seebeck coefficient

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52076080, 51576066]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province of China [E2019502138]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that sintered single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) blocks have higher ZT values at room temperature, while porous MWCNT sponges exhibit significantly lower thermal conductivity and enhanced ZT values. This research provides insight into exploring enhancement mechanisms and improving the thermoelectric properties of CNT-based thermoelectric composites.
Sintered carbon nanotube (CNT) blocks and porous CNT sponges were prepared, and their thermoelectric properties were measured. The maximum dimensionless thermoelectric figure-of-merit, ZT, at room temperature of the sintered single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) block is 9.34 x 10(-5), which is twice higher than that of the sintered multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) block in this work and also higher than that of other sintered MWCNT blocks reported previously. In addition, the porous MWCNT sponge showed an ultra-low thermal conductivity of 0.021 W/(mK) and significantly enhanced ZT value of 5.72 x 10(-4) at room temperature and 1 atm. This ZT value is higher than that of other 3D macroscopic pure CNT materials reported. The pronounced enhancement of the ZT in the porous MWCNT sponge is attributed to the ultra-low density, ultra-high porosity, and interconnected structure of the material, which lead to a fairly low thermal conductivity and better Seebeck coefficient. The finding of this work provides an understanding for exploring potential enhancement mechanisms and improving the thermoelectric properties of CNT-based thermoelectric composites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据