4.4 Review

The Use of Modeling Tools to Better Evaluate the Packaging Benefice on Our Environment

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.634038

关键词

shelf life; food loss and waste; life cycle analysis; modeling; modified atmosphere packaging; environmental impact

资金

  1. European Union [773375]
  2. Pack4Fresh project - INRA-CIRAD Metaprogram Glofoods
  3. FP7-ERA-NET [618107]
  4. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [773375] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Packaging plays a crucial role in maintaining food quality and extending shelf-life by reducing food loss and waste. Decision making tools are necessary to anticipate the usage benefits of packaging and its environmental impacts. More research is needed to quantify the links between shelf life extension, food loss reduction, and environmental benefits to determine the best packaging solutions for reducing the environmental impact of the food/packaging system.
Packaging play a key role on food quality preservation and shelf-life increase. Even if the link between shelf life and food loss has not yet clearly been formalized, it is generally observed that a well-designed packaging contributes to reduce food loss and waste and thus the corresponding useless negative impact that producing and distributing uneaten or inedible food has on our environment and economy. In order to anticipate the usage benefit of a given packaging, decision making tools are needed to be developed. While some authors' separately showed the importance of shelf life model, food loss and waste prediction model and Life Cycle Analysis, so far no connection was really made between them. In this context, this paper aims to analyze the different mathematical modeling approaches proposed in the available scientific literature, from the prediction of food shelf life gain thanks to well-designed packaging to the environmental benefice due to the decrease of food loss and waste. The article presents a review of 29 models developed on this thematic during the last two decades. The analyzed models were split in three categories: (1) the food shelf life models, (2) the models linking shelf life to food loss and waste, and (3) the Life Cycle Analysis including direct (production, processing and end of life) and indirect (food loss and waste) packaging environmental impacts. In one hand, the review showed that if many predicting approaches were conducted to assess food shelf life, only few of them were enough mechanistic (by coupling mass transfer to food deterioration) to be used in other conditions than the ones initially studied. Moreover, the consumers' practices and believes being strongly influent on the quantity of food waste at household, it should be more systematically integrated in the food loss and waste estimation for a fairer evaluation. On the other hand, this review highlighted that even if indirect environmental benefit of packaging, e.g., through food loss and waste decrease, is more and more integrated in life cycle analyses of the food packaging system, most of studies were only based on rough estimation and not on real quantification of the food loss and waste reduction obtained thanks to the well-designed packaging. Therefore, further research is needed to facilitate the representation/quantification of the links between shelf life increase for packed food, resulting food loss and waste reduction and environmental benefit to support the packaging sectors to choose and validate the best packaging solution to decrease the environmental impact of food/packaging system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据