4.6 Review

Stress-induced reactive oxygen species compartmentalization, perception and signalling

期刊

NATURE PLANTS
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 403-412

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41477-021-00887-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NIH 1R35GM136402]
  2. University of California, Davis Dean's Distinguished Graduate Fellowship
  3. Academy of Finland [323917]
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [20K05831]
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [323917, 323917] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20K05831] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent discoveries in ROS biology have emphasized the importance of ROS production and regulation in plant responses to abiotic and biotic stresses.
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are essential for life and are involved in the regulation of almost all biological processes. ROS production is critical for plant development, response to abiotic stresses and immune responses. Here, we focus on recent discoveries in ROS biology emphasizing abiotic and biotic stress responses. Recent advancements have resulted in the identification of one of the first sensors for extracellular ROS and highlighted waves of ROS production during stress signalling in Arabidopsis. Enzymes that produce ROS, including NADPH oxidases, exhibit precise regulation through diverse post-translational modifications. Discoveries highlight the importance of both amino- and carboxy-terminal regulation of NADPH oxidases through protein phosphorylation and cysteine oxidation. Here, we discuss advancements in ROS compartmentalization, systemic ROS waves, ROS sensing and post-translational modification of ROS-producing enzymes and identify areas where foundational gaps remain. This Review covers the recent advancements in our understanding of reactive oxygen species production, regulation and perception in plants. It is primarily focused on stress responses and the role of NADPH oxidases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据