4.6 Article

Electrocatalytic oxidation of water using self-assembled copper(ii) tetraaza macrocyclic complexes on a 4-(pyridine-4′-amido)benzene grafted gold electrode

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 45, 期 19, 页码 8676-8682

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1nj00630d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study presents the heterogenization of a Cu-based molecule on a gold electrode, showing promising catalytic activity for the electrocatalytic oxidation of water. The newly developed surface-bound complex exhibits excellent stability and efficiency in the oxygen evolution reaction, demonstrating potential as an efficient catalyst for water oxidation.
The oxidation of water is the most crucial step in electrochemical water splitting and artificial photosynthesis. To ease the water oxidation process, the development of stable, robust, and efficient catalysts is needed that can operate under mild conditions. Here we present the heterogenization of a Cu-based molecule [Cu(MC)](ClO4)(2) (where MC = 5,7,7,12,14,14-hexamethyl-1,4,8,11-tetra-azacyclotetradeca-4,11-diene) by immobilizing it on a 4-(pyridine-4 '-amido)benzene (L) layer modified gold electrode and explore its activity for the electrocatalytic oxidation of water in neutral phosphate buffer solution. The modified electrode was characterized using FE-SEM, EDX, ATR-FTIR, SERS, CV, and EIS techniques. The newly developed surface-bound complex [Cu(MC)]-L-Au can catalyze the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) exceptionally well with an onset overpotential of 227 mV (J = 1.0 mA cm(-2)), an overpotential similar to 284 mV at J = 1.32 mA cm(-2) and a low Tafel slope of 48 mV decade(-1). Furthermore, the Cu-based heterogeneous electrocatalyst has no observable decomposition during an 8-hour period of controlled potential electrolysis and displayed a substantial and stable current for O-2 evolution with a faradaic efficiency of >85%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据