First Amendment knowledge and competence in United States residents

Lacking adequate knowledge about one's rights could inhibit the likelihood of exercising one's rights or lead one to unwittingly violate laws that place legitimate limits on these rights. Thus, the present research examines First Amendment knowledge as well as competence to apply this knowledge in relevant circumstances. Results revealed that one-quarter of participants failed a test of objective knowledge on First Amendment rights. Furthermore, participants' belief in their ability varied depending on their level of knowledge, in line with the Dunning-Kruger effect. Participants also failed to transfer their limited objective knowledge to real-world situations, exhibiting impaired First Amendment competence. These findings suggest that US residents' levels of knowledge and competence related to First Amendment rights and protections could be improved to promote a safe, knowledgeable, and democratic society.

Automated summary

The research found that lacking knowledge about one's rights may inhibit the likelihood of exercising those rights, with one-quarter of participants failing a test on First Amendment knowledge. Furthermore, participants were unable to apply their limited knowledge to real-world situations, demonstrating impaired First Amendment competence.