4.0 Article

Biomarkers of memory variability in traumatic brain injury

期刊

BRAIN COMMUNICATIONS
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa202

关键词

traumatic brain injury; episodic memory; recall; theta; intracranial EEG

资金

  1. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Restoring Active Memory (RAM) program [N66001-14-2-4032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traumatic brain injury patients and controls show differences in memory ability and neural activity, but share similar features in successful memory formation, which can be used as predictors of recall probability and as a basis for novel therapies for neurological diseases.
Traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of cognitive disability and is often associated with significant impairment in episodic memory. In traumatic brain injury survivors, as in healthy controls, there is marked variability between individuals in memory ability. Using recordings from indwelling electrodes, we characterized and compared the oscillatory biomarkers of mnemonic variability in two cohorts of epilepsy patients: a group with a history of moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (n = 37) and a group of controls without traumatic brain injury (n = 111) closely matched for demographics and electrode coverage. Analysis of these recordings demonstrated that increased high-frequency power and decreased theta power across a broad set of brain regions mark periods of successful memory formation in both groups. As features in a logistic-regression classifier, spectral power biomarkers effectively predicted recall probability, with little difference between traumatic brain injury patients and controls. The two groups also displayed similar patterns of theta-frequency connectivity during successful encoding periods. These biomarkers of successful memory, highly conserved between traumatic brain injury patients and controls, could serve as the basis for novel therapies that target disordered memory across diverse forms of neurological disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据