4.5 Article

A path planning method for UAVs based on multi-objective pigeon-inspired optimisation and differential evolution

期刊

出版社

INDERSCIENCE ENTERPRISES LTD
DOI: 10.1504/IJBIC.2021.114079

关键词

path planning; unmanned aerial vehicle; UAV; pigeon-inspired optimisation; differential evolution

资金

  1. Science and Technology Innovation 2030-Key Project of 'New Generation Artificial Intelligence' [2018AAA0102303, 2018AAA0102403]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91948204, 91648205, U1913602]
  3. Aeronautical Foundation of China [20185851022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an improved method of path planning and autonomous formation for unmanned aerial vehicles based on pigeon-inspired optimization and differential evolution. The mathematical model for UAV path planning is devised as a multi-objective optimization, and the method integrated by pigeon-inspired optimization and mutation strategies of differential evolution is developed to optimize feasible paths. Simulation results show the effectiveness of the proposed method compared with standard particle swarm optimization and standard differential evolution algorithms.
Inspired by the behaviour of pigeon flocks, an improved method of path planning and autonomous formation for unmanned aerial vehicles based on the pigeon-inspired optimisation and differential evolution is proposed in this paper. Firstly, the mathematical model for UAV path planning is devised as a multi-objective optimisation with three indices, i.e., the length of a path, the sinuosity of a path, and the risk of a path. Then, the method integrated by pigeon-inspired optimisation and mutation strategies of differential evolution is developed to optimise feasible paths. Besides, Pareto dominance is applied to select the global best position of a pigeon. Finally, a series of simulation results compared with standard particle swarm optimisation algorithm and standard differential evolution algorithm show the effectiveness of our method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据