4.6 Article

Effect of electron-withdrawing groups on molecular properties of naphthyl and anthryl bithiophenes as potential n-type semiconductors

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 45, 期 22, 页码 9794-9804

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1nj01100f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research and Development Agency of the Slovak Republic [APVV-17-0501]
  2. Scientific Grant Agency of the Slovak Republic [1/0595/17, 2/0081/18, 1/0718/19]
  3. Research & Innovation Operational Programme - ERDF [313021T081]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of ten 2-naphthyl and 2-anthrylbithiophene derivatives with electron acceptor groups were synthesized, and the effects of various electron-withdrawing groups on their properties were investigated. The study showed that different functional groups can modulate the LUMO level and energy gap of the derivatives, and TD-DFT calculations helped to understand electronic transitions.
A series of ten 2-naphthyl and 2-anthrylbithiophene derivatives with electron acceptor groups were synthesised using the Negishi or Suzuki cross-coupling reaction as a key step. We present a comparison of theoretical and experimental values of the LUMO and gap energies of these derivatives and the effect of the various electron-withdrawing groups on their optical and electrochemical properties. DFT-calculated frontier orbital energy differences have shown a trend following the experimentally determined values. The participation of the electron-withdrawing group in pi-conjugation decreases the LUMO level and narrows the energy gap in the order of perfluoroalkyl, acyl, perfluoroacyl, nitro approximate to dicyanovinyl in both series. TD-DFT calculations allowed better understanding of electronic transitions. X-ray structure analysis of naphthalene hexanoyl and perfluorooctanoyl derivatives revealed their herringbone or sandwich herringbone molecular packing, respectively, having a planar naphthalene-bithiophene moiety with opposite (s-trans vs. s-cis) conformation of bithiophene.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据