4.5 Article

A computational evaluation of constructive heuristics for the parallel blocking flow shop problem with sequence-dependent setup times

出版社

GROWING SCIENCE
DOI: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2021.1.004

关键词

Blocking; Parallel flow shop; Distributed flow shop; Dependent setup times; Makespan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper addresses the scheduling problem in a parallel flow shop environment without buffers between machines and with sequence-dependent setup times to minimize the maximum completion time of jobs. 36 heuristics were tested, with one designed specifically for considerable setup times showing good performance. A combined heuristic approach was also proposed for finding good solutions in a short CPU time.
This paper deals with the problem of scheduling jobs in a parallel flow shop environment without buffers between machines and with sequence-dependent setup times in order to minimize the maximum completion time of jobs. The blocking constraint normally leads to an increase in the maximum completion time of jobs due to the blockage of machines, which can increase even more so when setup times are considerable. Hence, the heuristic to solve this problem must take into account these specificities in order to minimize the timeout of machines. Because the procedures designed to solve the parallel flow shop scheduling problem must deal not only with the sequencing of jobs but also with their allocation to the flow shops, 36 heuristics have been tested in this paper, of which 35 combine sequencing rules with allocation methods while the last one takes a different approach that is more related to the nature of this problem. The computational evaluation of the implemented heuristics showed good performance of the heuristic designed especially for the problem (RCP0) when the setup times are considerable. Furthermore, the evaluation has also allowed us to propose a combined heuristic that leads to good solutions in a short CPU time. (C) 2021 by the authors; licensee Growing Science, Canada

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据