3.8 Article

Reflecting on a collaborative approach to a regional sustainability transition: Dingle Peninsula 2030

期刊

REFLECTIVE PRACTICE
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 415-429

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14623943.2021.1911794

关键词

Collaborative governance; reflection; reflective practice; sustainability; reflective learning

资金

  1. ESB Netowkrs
  2. MaREI, The SFI Research Centre for Energy, Climate and Marine [12/RC/2302_P2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper uses reflective practice to examine the role of collaborative governance in promoting the sociotechnical transition to a low-carbon society. The study emphasizes the need for more collaboration between local communities, national public bodies, and research organizations, as well as the role of individuals in collaborative governance.
This paper uses a reflective method to gather findings with relation to a collaborative governance approach for the sociotechnical transition to a low carbon society in a regional context. As top-down and bottom-up approaches to sustainable transitions have proven insufficient in bringing about the necessary changes required to meet the demands of climate action, more collaborative approaches between local communities, national public bodies and research organisations are warranted. Within this, there is a need to understand the dynamics of collaborative governance for participants in the process. Through a process of reflective practice, this paper outlines the networks, personal capacities, organisational capacities, benefits and challenges of collaborative governance partnerships for sustainable transitions from the perspective of individuals within a collaborative committee working on a regional transition project on the Dingle Peninsula, Co Kerry, Ireland. Alongside this, some solutions to challenges outlined through reflection are highlighted. This research paper highlights the need for the incorporation of reflective practice within collaborative governance for the socio-technical transition to a low-carbon society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据