4.6 Article

A novel catalytic two-step process for the preparation of rigid polyurethane foams: synthesis, mechanism and computational studies

期刊

REACTION CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 7, 页码 1238-1245

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1re00102g

关键词

-

资金

  1. project FOREST-COMP - CUP [H56C18000080005]
  2. University of Calabria
  3. Calabria Region (PAC CALABRIA) [B 10.5.12 CUP: H28D19000040006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study developed an innovative, eco-sustainable, and cost-effective method for producing high-quality rigid polyurethane foam. By using a single initial addition of a cheap catalyst, the method proved effective for both the pre-polymer formation and polyurethane chain elongation, while also allowing the salt to be regenerated for a new catalytic cycle during the formation of the final polyurethane.
Polyurethanes (PUs) are very versatile and popular polymers that play a key role in the automotive, construction and non-food consumable sectors. In general, two-step polyurethane synthetic procedures involve the addition of catalysts also in the second phase of the reaction with problems of high environmental impact and disposal. In this work, an innovative eco-sustainable and very cheap procedure for the production of high-quality rigid polyurethane (PU) foams was developed, starting from polyethylene glycol (PEG 400) and diisocyanates as reagents and using common inorganic salts as catalysts, such as sodium chloride. In particular, our innovatory method is based on a single initial addition of a very cheap catalyst that is proved to be effective for both the prepolymer formation and polyurethane chain elongation. Moreover, simultaneous with the formation of final polyurethane, the salt was restored for a new catalytic cycle. Then, our strategy for polyurethane foam synthesis can surely represent a valid alternative as a very inexpensive and eco-compatible process, also for the industrial field. Finally, detailed mechanistic hypotheses were formulated and supported by DFT calculations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据