4.7 Article

Stability Analysis and Design of Local Control Schemes in Active Distribution Grids

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
卷 36, 期 3, 页码 1900-1909

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2020.3026448

关键词

Reactive power; Stability analysis; Power system stability; Inverters; Voltage measurement; Power system dynamics; Power measurement; Active distribution networks; data-driven control design; local Volt; VAr control; stability analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the impact of local feedback control schemes on system stability when distributed energy resources (DERs) are connected to distribution grids, and explores solutions to the interference issues among multiple DERs. Using low-pass filters on DER set-points achieves closed-loop stability, preventing grid destabilization even with high-gain local control laws.
The connection of distributed energy resources (DERs) to distribution feeders can significantly increase the operational flexibility of system operators. Local feedback control schemes (such as Volt/VAr droop curves) are a cheap, scalable, and communication-free solution to control DERs in active distribution grids. However, these controllers can interfere detrimentally with each other when they act on multiple DERs connected to the same grid. We show that even the standardized curves recommended in the most recent grid codes may exhibit an unstable behavior. In this paper, we investigate the stability of local incremental DER control laws in three-phase active distribution grids with balanced, and unbalanced loading, and we bound the resulting rate of convergence. The use of low-pass filters on the DER set-points allows us to achieve closed-loop stability even for high-gain local control laws that would otherwise destabilize the grid. This feature is particularly relevant in data-driven approaches that yield optimal DER local control schemes, often in the form of steep customized piece-wise linear Volt/VAr curves.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据