4.8 Article

Origin of the low conversion efficiency in Cu2ZnSnS4 kesterite solar cells: the actual role of cation disorder

期刊

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 3567-3578

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ee00260k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Conseil de lAction Internationale (CAI)
  2. F.R.S.-FNRS
  3. Walloon Region [1117545]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study examines the controversial role of cation disorder in the low open-circuit voltage of CZTS kesterite absorber. It suggests that extensive disorder stabilizes the formation of Sn-Zn antisite, contributing to the V-OC deficit. The methodology presented in this work offers insight into optimizing kesterite solar devices for higher efficiency.
The controversial role of cation disorder in the extraordinarily low open-circuit voltage (V-OC) of the Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) kesterite absorber is examined through a statistical treatment of disorder within the cluster-expansion method. It is demonstrated that the extensive Cu-Zn disorder alone cannot be responsible for the large Urbach tails observed in many CZTS solar cells. While the band gap is reduced as a result of the Gaussian tails formed near the valence-band edge due to Cu clustering, band-gap fluctuations contribute only marginally to the V-OC deficit, thereby excluding Cu-Zn disorder as the primary source of the low efficiency of CZTS devices. On the other hand, the extensive disorder stabilizes the formation of Sn-Zn antisite and its defect complexes, which as nonradiative recombination and minority carrier trapping centers dominate the V-OC loss in CZTS. Our analysis indicates that current CZTS devices might have already approached the maximum conversion efficiency (14%) given the limited growth conditions and the remnant cation disorder even after postannealing. In view of the improved efficiency achieved with CZTS-derived kesterite absorbers, the methodology presented in this work offers an avenue to understanding and optimizing these emerging kesterite solar devices towards higher efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据