4.5 Article

Fecundity regulation strategy of the blue jack mackerel, Trachurus picturatus (Bowdich, 1825), off Madeira Island (NE Atlantic)

期刊

FISHERIES RESEARCH
卷 190, 期 -, 页码 150-156

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2017.02.009

关键词

Trachurus picturatus; blue jack mackerel; fecundity type; Madeira Island; Northeastern Atlantic

资金

  1. ARDITI - Regional Agency for the Development of Research Technology and Innovation
  2. Programme RUMOS [22/1080/1974]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This contribution intends to verify the type of fecundity regulation of the blue jack mackerel. For this purpose, the oocyte development process was analysed. A total of 158 ovaries were sampled between January 2009 and April 2010 from purse-seiners operating in the Madeira Island waters, NE Atlantic Ocean. Histological analysis and visual image analysis system were used to study the four main criteria applied for fecundity type determination: (1) presence of a hiatus between pre-vitellogenic and vitellogenic oocytes; (2) number of standing stock of advanced vitellogenic oocytes over the spawning season; (3) mean size of standing stock of advanced vitellogenic oocytes over the spawning season; and (4) the incidence of atresia over the spawning season. The analysis of the oocytes size frequency distribution showed that no distinct hiatus could be observed between pre-vitellogenic and vitellogenic oocytes during the spawning season. Considering the whole spawning period but the last month that was poorly sampled, the number of standing stock of advanced vitellogenic oocytes showed no decrease trend along the spawning season, the mean diameter of cortical alveoli oocytes and of the advanced stock of vitellogenic oocytes did not increase over the spawning season and the relative intensity of atresia was always high throughout this period. These findings suggest the blue jack mackerel displays an indeterminate fecundity. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据