3.8 Proceedings Paper

Novel dithiocabamate nano Zn(II), Cd(II) and Hg(II) complexes with pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate and N,N-diethyldithiocarbamate

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS
卷 43, 期 -, 页码 863-868

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.082

关键词

Dithiocarbamate; Pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate; N,N-diethyldithiocarbamate; Nanocomplexes; SEM

资金

  1. Tikrit University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully synthesized metal complexes by reacting two different dithiocarbamate ligands with zinc, cadmium, and mercury ions, and characterized them using various techniques. These complexes were obtained as nanocomplexes with regular geometrical nanostructures such as nanosheets, nanorods, and merged nanospheres.
The reaction of the equimolar ratio of ammonium pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate {(NH4)PyDT} and sodium N,N-diethyldithiocarbamate (NaEt2DT) with the divalent ion salts of zinc, cadmium and mercury resulted in the complexes of the type [M(kappa(2)-PyDT)(K-2-Et2DT)]; {M(II) = Zn, Cd, Hg}. These complexes were characterized using different techniques: elemental analysis, molar conductivity, FTIR, H-1 NMR, C-13{1(H)} NMR and HSQC. The results demonstrate the bidentate chelating mode of the two dithiocarbamate ligands through the sulfur atoms to afford a tetrahedral geometry around the metal ion. Surprisingly, these coordination compounds were obtained as nanocomplexes with regular geometrical nanostructures as follows; [Zn(kappa(2)-PyDT)(kappa(2)-Et2DT)] (1) as nanosheets with a thickness of 21-24 nm, [Cd(kappa(2)-PyDT) (kappa(2)-Et2DT)] (2) as nanorods with a diameter of 70-380 nm while [Hg(kappa(2)-PyDT)(kappa(2)-Et2DT)] (3) was found as merged nanospheres with a diameter of 54?70 nm. These nanostructures have been demonstrated using the SEM and X-ray diffraction of the powder. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Advanced Materials Behavior and Characterization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据