4.0 Article

First reports of short-term temporal variations in crustacean species richness in north Patagonian coastal temporary pools

期刊

NAUPLIUS
卷 29, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SOC BRASILEIRA CARCINOLOGIA
DOI: 10.1590/2358-2936e2021020

关键词

Boeckella gracilis; Branchinecta rocaensis; Chile; Cladocera; Copepoda; crustacean; zooplankton

资金

  1. Department of Biological and Chemical Sciences [MECESUP UCT 0804]
  2. Technical Faculty of the Catholic University of Temuco

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Temporary pools in northern Chilean Patagonia showed marked differences in species richness under different water chemistry parameters, with the dominant species being the calanoid copepod. Community analysis using co-occurrence null models revealed a lack of structured patterns in species associations, with many repeated species occupying similar ecological niches. The results of this study align with observations from temporary pools in southern Chilean Patagonia.
Temporary pools are freshwater bodies of significant interest due to their high species diversity, and the colonization and extinction processes observed at temporal scales. The aim of the present study was to perform a short-term ecological comparison in a group of shallow temporary pools in northern Chilean Patagonia in two periods, August and September 2018. The results revealed marked differences in terms of species richness in the study pools at different conductivities and chlorophyll a concentrations. The dominant species was the calanoid copepod Boeckella gracilis Daday, 1902, while the presence of the rare Anostracan Branchinecta rocaensis Cohen, 1982 was reported in conditions of low chlorophyll a and low conductivity. The community was studied using co-occurrence null models that revealed the absence of structured patterns in species associations, and the presence of niche overlap, with many repeated species that have a similar ecological niche. The present results are identical with observations from temporary pools in southern Chilean Patagonia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据