4.8 Article

Biphasic, Membrane-Free Zn/Phenothiazine Battery: Effects of Hydrophobicity of Redox Materials on Cyclability

期刊

ACS MATERIALS LETTERS
卷 3, 期 4, 页码 337-343

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.1c00061

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Cincinnati
  2. NSF-MRI [CHE-1726092]
  3. National Science Foundation [CHE-1955161]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the use of immiscible electrolytes, water and dichloromethane, in membrane-free redox stratified batteries. The battery with phenothiazines as catholytes and zinc metal as anolyte shows stable long cycling performance with a capacity retention of 79.1% over 202 cycles. The hydrophobicity of the phenothiazine molecules significantly affects their solubility in dichloromethane and battery cyclability.
The lack of a suitable ionic exchange membrane has retarded the development of organic nonaqueous redox flow batteries (RFBs). Membrane-free redox stratified batteries, wherein electroactive materials in immiscible nonaqueous and aqueous solvents as anolyte and catholyte, have emerged as a promising strategy to mitigate the high dependence of RFBs on battery separators. Here we report the exploration of the application of immiscible electrolytes, water and dichloromethane, in membrane-free redox stratified batteries. With 0.5 M phenothiazines in dichloromethane as the catholytes and zinc metal in aqueous electrolyte as the anolyte, the aqueous/nonaqueous stratified battery presents stable long cycling with a capacity retention of 79.1% over 202 cycles under ambient testing conditions. Study of phenothiazines with varying lengths of alkyl chains (C0, C3, C8, and C18) reveals that the hydrophobicity of the phenothiazine molecules greatly affects the solubility in dichloromethane and battery cyclability. Computation on free energy of solvation and molecular dynamics is also performed to elucidate the hydrophobicity effects. The results presented in this work lay a solid foundation for potential development of the membrane-free RFBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据