4.7 Article

Tradeoff Relations in Quantum Resource Theory

期刊

ADVANCED QUANTUM TECHNOLOGIES
卷 4, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/qute.202100036

关键词

coherence; entanglement; quantum resource theory; tradeoff relations

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12075001, 61601002, 11875167, 12004006, 11575001]
  2. Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation [1508085QF139, 2008085QA43]
  3. CAS Key Laboratory of Quantum Information [KQI201701]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the tradeoff relations between intrinsic concurrence and first-order coherence in arbitrary three-qubit states, providing a physical explanation for the migration of coherence in three-qubit systems. The derived tradeoff relations reveal the complementarity between intrinsic concurrence and first-order coherence, offering a reliable theoretical basis for the transformation and flow of quantum resources.
Entanglement and coherence are deemed as two unreplaceable and important quantum resources in the regime of quantum physics, which are widely applied to quantum information processing and quantum computation. It is therefore natural to ask if there exists any intrinsic relationship between entanglement and coherence. In this work, the authors originally put forward tradeoff relations between intrinsic concurrence and first-order coherence in the context of an arbitrary three-qubit state. To do so, an equality relation related to the quantum entanglement and first-order coherence for arbitrary three-qubit pure states is derived first, and then extended to present another tradeoff relation regarding arbitrary three-qubit states. Notably, physical explanation is offered for how coherence migrates in three-qubit systems from first-order coherence of a given subsystem to quantum correlations between subsystems. The result shows that the derived tradeoff relations can reveal the complementarity between intrinsic concurrence and first-order coherence, which provides reliable theoretical basis of transformation and flow for quantum resources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据