4.5 Review

Alternative splicing in Alzheimer's disease

期刊

AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 747-758

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40520-019-01360-x

关键词

Alternative Splicing; Alzheimer's disease; RNA-Binding proteins; Antisense oligonucleotides

资金

  1. National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Research Project Aging: molecular and technological innovations for improving the health of the elderly population [MIUR 2867 25.11.2011]
  2. AMANDA project Accordo Quadro Regione Lombardia-CNR
  3. AIRC -FIRC ITALY postdoctoral fellowship
  4. Arturo Falaschi Fondazione Adriano Buzzati-Traverso (FAB-T) postdoctoral fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease is the most common neurodegenerative disorder in the elderly, with approximately 20% of people over 80 affected. Recent studies have shown that Alternative Splicing is involved in gene expression reprogramming and splicing abnormalities in AD tissues. While the molecular causes of AD are still poorly understood, therapeutic approaches targeting aberrant AS regulation offer potential new treatments.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most frequent neurodegenerative disorder in the elderly, occurring in approximately 20% of people older than 80. The molecular causes of AD are still poorly understood. However, recent studies have shown that Alternative Splicing (AS) is involved in the gene expression reprogramming associated with the functional changes observed in AD patients. In particular, mutations in cis-acting regulatory sequences as well as alterations in the activity and sub-cellular localization of trans-acting splicing factors and components of the spliceosome machinery are associated with splicing abnormalities in AD tissues, which may influence the onset and progression of the disease. In this review, we discuss the current molecular understanding of how alterations in the AS process contribute to AD pathogenesis. Finally, recent therapeutic approaches targeting aberrant AS regulation in AD are also reviewed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据